Our best players still aren’t good enough

In light of the two threads today "Are today’s players really better technically?" and "Do top level players have to play on top teams to develop?" comes this article.



http://community.soccerinteractive.c...sg_mes_network


We identify our best players, but our best players still aren’t good enough.

Friday, January 14, 2011

I have recently finished reading the latest Soccer Journal, specifically Gary Allen’s article, “Developing Speed of Play”. Gary is on the US Youth Soccer Staff and the article is well written. Like many of the articles in the Soccer Journal the authors consistently recommend that we as a nation need to put more emphasis on individual player development. Gary writes, “For us to develop players who can play with multi-dimensional quickness, we must focus more on the process for each player rather than on creating tiers of result-seeking teams at younger and younger ages.” This has been a common theme not only in the Soccer Journal but in the entire soccer media actively involved in the discussion of player development in the US. SoccerAmerica winter issue 2011; Warning Signs, by Paul Kennedy. “Former star Julie Foudy suggested that U.S. Soccer work more with the women’s game at the youth level, where the USA is beginning to lag behind such countries as South Korea and Japan, which are both producing marvelous young players.”

When I look at the soccer landscape in the US I see that the major organizations have done and are doing a significant amount of work identifying our best players. ODP is the most prevalent example as well as US Club Soccer’s id2 program. In addition there is a plethora of leagues specifically designed and marketed as Elite players Identification and Development Leagues, USYSA Regional, US Soccer Development Academy, Super Y, US Club, Elite Clubs National League are the most notable. For those of us that can remember Project 40, the same theme was presented, specifically that if you identify the best players have them train and play together then you will develop the players skilled enough to win a World Cup.

So what’s wrong with this picture?

The assumption while partially correct, players will develop at a faster pace when challenged by equal or better players, does not take into consideration that our fundamental skill level throughout the country is far below that of the dominant soccer powers in the rest of the world. In addition, we as a nation have done little if anything to encourage our young players to develop elite skills. Rather as is indicated in Gary’s article we have put the emphasis on creating teams with the best athletes not creating the best skilled players.

OK, so what do we do?

When you look at the research that has been done on how elite athletes are developed there is only one common element. Elite athletes invest at least 10,000 hours in deliberate practice routines. Deliberate practice routines are repetitive activities involving basic fundamental skills. (Ericsson, K. A. (2006). (The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance.) These practice routines are not fun and they are not entertaining but they are the only way to become an elite athlete. While there is an appropriate place for social competitive and recreational soccer programs there should also be a place and an emphasis on elite development programs. These elite development programs must have as their primary goal, the development of individual fundamental skills associated with the game of soccer. Playing on elite teams and playing in elite leagues must be secondary to the primary goals. The majority of the player’s time in these new programs must be spent on deliberate practice routines. In addition unlike most of the current elite programs which measure their success in the wins and losses column the elite development programs must see their success in individual players becoming highly skilled, something we currently spend very little time measuring and rewarding. Here again is where we as a nation have failed to emphasize the appropriate activities necessary to help develop elite players. Far too many of our programs at the youth level have set “players having fun” and “winning games” as the most important goal for the program to achieve. In addition our overall emphasis on Outcome Goals, winning games, is in direct conflict with that which Goal achievement research has determined. In their research of college-aged soccer players Filby, Maynard and Graydon (1999) concluded; “After five weeks of training, results showed that the two multiple goal strategy groups outperformed the other three groups. Relatively speaking, the group exhibiting the lowest level of improvement was the OUTCOME ONLY group.” In spite of this research will still see the major emphasis with our best players is on game results rather than developing individual skills. If we want to compete at the highest level we must change our youth programs and start new programs dedicated to producing highly skilled players. These programs must start when the players are U9 not when they are U16-U18 by that time it is far too late to develop the exceptional skills required to become an elite player.

How is this different from what our elite clubs are doing?

The majority of elite programs in our country are focused on preparing players and teams to compete effectively in the next match. While a truly developmental elite program will focus on the individual development of the players. For example most elite programs at the U9-U11 age will recruit the best athletes in the area and train them to compete, (win) at the highest level or most likely an age group or two up. Again using the false assumption that if you play against players of your ability or higher you will become an elite player. In contrast a truly developmental program will recruit the best players and have them engage in deliberate practice routines based on fundamental skills. The fundamental skills of soccer can be broken down into four groups; 1. Skills used in moving with the ball, 2. Skills used in receiving the ball, 3. Skills used in redirecting the ball and 4. Skills used in moving without the ball. New programs need to challenge these players to compete against each other in objective competitive skills activities based on these four groups. In addition programs need to add small sided games, 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4 as the primary focus. The objective competitive skills activities are measured and recorded so players can not only see their individual improvement but they can also set measurable Performance and Process goals based on their own individual results. The small sided games are competitive but on an individual level not a team level. This is accomplished in two phases: First points for wins(3), ties(1), goals(max of 3) and shut outs(.5) are awarded to each player on a team after each game, Second, players are mixed and play with a different group of players each game. The result of this small sided game process is that a player hierarchy based on game results is established. The benefit to the development process is that you are now recognizing and rewarding the individual player for their own efforts and achievements. This process is directly in line with developmental research that indicates players develop farther and faster when they are given individual immediate objective feedback and are engaged in the process of setting and managing individual measurable goals. Outside team competition is also a part of the developmental program however it should be a smaller part of the process. Leagues with limited games and one or two tournaments per year would be adequate. At the U13-U15 age groups the majority of the training time is still concentrated on individual skills enhancement and small sided games, 8 vs 8 while full sided games and tactical training is also part of the process.

The conclusion

If we as a nation want to effectively compete at the highest levels in the game of soccer now and in the future then our national organizations along with our local clubs need to establish and maintain a new developmental process that is focused on the individual player and not on elite teams. I firmly believe that the skill level of our younger players, U9 to U15 must be improved extensively or we will never be able to win a men's world cup and will struggle to maintain our dominance in the women's game. We need to give our National team coaches the best skilled players in the world if we expect them to compete effectively against the world’s best teams.



By Brad Partridge

Brad Partridge has been actively coaching since 1989. He has his USSF National Youth License, NSCAA Premier and DOC Certification. He has been the Head Coach for the Palm Beach United WPSL team since 2004, he has been a Staff ODP coach in Florida since 2003 and is currently coaching at the Kicks Soccer Club in West Palm Beach, Florida

Brad can be reached at Partpro@aol.com

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In light of the two threads today "Are today’s players really better technically?" and "Do top level players have to play on top teams to develop?" comes this article.



http://community.soccerinteractive.c...sg_mes_network


We identify our best players, but our best players still aren’t good enough.

Friday, January 14, 2011

I have recently finished reading the latest Soccer Journal, specifically Gary Allen’s article, “Developing Speed of Play”. Gary is on the US Youth Soccer Staff and the article is well written. Like many of the articles in the Soccer Journal the authors consistently recommend that we as a nation need to put more emphasis on individual player development. Gary writes, “For us to develop players who can play with multi-dimensional quickness, we must focus more on the process for each player rather than on creating tiers of result-seeking teams at younger and younger ages.” This has been a common theme not only in the Soccer Journal but in the entire soccer media actively involved in the discussion of player development in the US. SoccerAmerica winter issue 2011; Warning Signs, by Paul Kennedy. “Former star Julie Foudy suggested that U.S. Soccer work more with the women’s game at the youth level, where the USA is beginning to lag behind such countries as South Korea and Japan, which are both producing marvelous young players.”

When I look at the soccer landscape in the US I see that the major organizations have done and are doing a significant amount of work identifying our best players. ODP is the most prevalent example as well as US Club Soccer’s id2 program. In addition there is a plethora of leagues specifically designed and marketed as Elite players Identification and Development Leagues, USYSA Regional, US Soccer Development Academy, Super Y, US Club, Elite Clubs National League are the most notable. For those of us that can remember Project 40, the same theme was presented, specifically that if you identify the best players have them train and play together then you will develop the players skilled enough to win a World Cup.

So what’s wrong with this picture?

The assumption while partially correct, players will develop at a faster pace when challenged by equal or better players, does not take into consideration that our fundamental skill level throughout the country is far below that of the dominant soccer powers in the rest of the world. In addition, we as a nation have done little if anything to encourage our young players to develop elite skills. Rather as is indicated in Gary’s article we have put the emphasis on creating teams with the best athletes not creating the best skilled players.

OK, so what do we do?

When you look at the research that has been done on how elite athletes are developed there is only one common element. Elite athletes invest at least 10,000 hours in deliberate practice routines. Deliberate practice routines are repetitive activities involving basic fundamental skills. (Ericsson, K. A. (2006). (The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance.) These practice routines are not fun and they are not entertaining but they are the only way to become an elite athlete. While there is an appropriate place for social competitive and recreational soccer programs there should also be a place and an emphasis on elite development programs. These elite development programs must have as their primary goal, the development of individual fundamental skills associated with the game of soccer. Playing on elite teams and playing in elite leagues must be secondary to the primary goals. The majority of the player’s time in these new programs must be spent on deliberate practice routines. In addition unlike most of the current elite programs which measure their success in the wins and losses column the elite development programs must see their success in individual players becoming highly skilled, something we currently spend very little time measuring and rewarding. Here again is where we as a nation have failed to emphasize the appropriate activities necessary to help develop elite players. Far too many of our programs at the youth level have set “players having fun” and “winning games” as the most important goal for the program to achieve. In addition our overall emphasis on Outcome Goals, winning games, is in direct conflict with that which Goal achievement research has determined. In their research of college-aged soccer players Filby, Maynard and Graydon (1999) concluded; “After five weeks of training, results showed that the two multiple goal strategy groups outperformed the other three groups. Relatively speaking, the group exhibiting the lowest level of improvement was the OUTCOME ONLY group.” In spite of this research will still see the major emphasis with our best players is on game results rather than developing individual skills. If we want to compete at the highest level we must change our youth programs and start new programs dedicated to producing highly skilled players. These programs must start when the players are U9 not when they are U16-U18 by that time it is far too late to develop the exceptional skills required to become an elite player.

How is this different from what our elite clubs are doing?

The majority of elite programs in our country are focused on preparing players and teams to compete effectively in the next match. While a truly developmental elite program will focus on the individual development of the players. For example most elite programs at the U9-U11 age will recruit the best athletes in the area and train them to compete, (win) at the highest level or most likely an age group or two up. Again using the false assumption that if you play against players of your ability or higher you will become an elite player. In contrast a truly developmental program will recruit the best players and have them engage in deliberate practice routines based on fundamental skills. The fundamental skills of soccer can be broken down into four groups; 1. Skills used in moving with the ball, 2. Skills used in receiving the ball, 3. Skills used in redirecting the ball and 4. Skills used in moving without the ball. New programs need to challenge these players to compete against each other in objective competitive skills activities based on these four groups. In addition programs need to add small sided games, 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4 as the primary focus. The objective competitive skills activities are measured and recorded so players can not only see their individual improvement but they can also set measurable Performance and Process goals based on their own individual results. The small sided games are competitive but on an individual level not a team level. This is accomplished in two phases: First points for wins(3), ties(1), goals(max of 3) and shut outs(.5) are awarded to each player on a team after each game, Second, players are mixed and play with a different group of players each game. The result of this small sided game process is that a player hierarchy based on game results is established. The benefit to the development process is that you are now recognizing and rewarding the individual player for their own efforts and achievements. This process is directly in line with developmental research that indicates players develop farther and faster when they are given individual immediate objective feedback and are engaged in the process of setting and managing individual measurable goals. Outside team competition is also a part of the developmental program however it should be a smaller part of the process. Leagues with limited games and one or two tournaments per year would be adequate. At the U13-U15 age groups the majority of the training time is still concentrated on individual skills enhancement and small sided games, 8 vs 8 while full sided games and tactical training is also part of the process.

The conclusion

If we as a nation want to effectively compete at the highest levels in the game of soccer now and in the future then our national organizations along with our local clubs need to establish and maintain a new developmental process that is focused on the individual player and not on elite teams. I firmly believe that the skill level of our younger players, U9 to U15 must be improved extensively or we will never be able to win a men's world cup and will struggle to maintain our dominance in the women's game. We need to give our National team coaches the best skilled players in the world if we expect them to compete effectively against the world’s best teams.



By Brad Partridge

Brad Partridge has been actively coaching since 1989. He has his USSF National Youth License, NSCAA Premier and DOC Certification. He has been the Head Coach for the Palm Beach United WPSL team since 2004, he has been a Staff ODP coach in Florida since 2003 and is currently coaching at the Kicks Soccer Club in West Palm Beach, Florida

Brad can be reached at Partpro@aol.com

Dude,

"We as a nation" ? You can't be serous.

US club soccer is a rich suburban kid's game. You are not scanning the vast majority of the population for the best players.

Sure the women had their World Cup run but, they are pretty much done now. Their last showing was a national embarassment. (I think they finished second ?)

In the US, World Cup Soccer is kind of like America's Cup Sailing; there is interest if your a legit contender to win. Otherwise, who cares.

The conclusion

If we as a nation want to effectively compete at the highest levels in the game of soccer now and in the future then our national organizations along with our local clubs need to establish and maintain a new developmental process that is focused on the individual player and not on elite teams. I firmly believe that the skill level of our younger players, U9 to U15 must be improved extensively or we will never be able to win a men's world cup and will struggle to maintain our dominance in the women's game. We need to give our National team coaches the best skilled players in the world if we expect them to compete effectively against the world’s best teams.

There's a chicken or the egg thing going on here. You can have lots of u9-u15 teams with a few talented players who are excited about the game, playing with kids that maybe aren't so. The talented kids (and their parents) will gravitate towards other talented kids because its fun to play with kids who also are talented and excited about the game.

Talented players coming together training and playing together - that sounds like an "elite" team.

All the bad mouthing about anything to do with American soccer is just grousing by folks with an opinion - and we all have one. Whether we aren't as good at Spain or the Brazilians right now - yah, you're right, but we're getting better all the time. The number of Americans playing soccer at every level is going up. As we continue, we'll get to a point where we can compete with the best. Has that day come - no. Will it be here in the next WC cycle, probably not. But eight years from now or twelve years from now - I could see America not being satisfied with making the second round of the WC.

The area of American soccer I'm most intrigued with is the development of an American "style" of soccer. I don't know what that style might be? But I do think American culture, and how kids grow up in America, is different enough from the rest of the world that until we figure out our own way of playing soccer, we are going to be chasing all the other countries that grow up with the game.

I could be totally off base here, but I thought USA Soccer missed an extraordinary opportunity when it couldn't come to terms with Jurgen Klinsmen, the former German national team coach who lives (or did live) in California to be the MNT Coach. There a guy, I sensed, understood both the game at the highest level as well as American kids and culture. I thought with him, there might be the moment when American soccer made that great leap forward.

But the poobahs of USA Soccer saw it differently and we have Bob Bradley. He seems a decent enough guy, but inspiring is not a word I would use to describe him. And I wouldn't say our MNT, short of Landon's run for the ages last summer, has been particularly inspiring - kinda like the coach. The scuttlebutt I remember reading about USA Soccer decision to not hire Klinsman was that he wanted ability to make changes up and down American soccer from the national team all the way to the kiddy programs. I don't know if that's true, but I could easily see all those poobahs not wanting to give up their place in the food chain to some foreign hotshot - this is American soccer....

And American soccer is what we have for the moment. Lots of people starting clubs, fielding teams. Everyone doing there own thing, lots of opinions and the players doing the best they can to keep developing their game.

We'll get there. I bet when the current high school players are parents, the current crop of club DOCs and coaches and USA Soccer poobahs will be long gone and the new poobahs will have grown up with the game, just like those other countries, and we'll be going deep into the WC.

believe that because American kids typically do not grow up in soccer based cultures as the rest of the world does, we come to soccer "late", and...., there are so many other sports and things for kids to do.

Brad can be reached at Partpro@aol.com[/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The conclusion

If we as a nation want to effectively compete at the highest levels in the game of soccer now and in the future then our national organizations along with our local clubs need to establish and maintain a new developmental process that is focused on the individual player and not on elite teams. I firmly believe that the skill level of our younger players, U9 to U15 must be improved extensively or we will never be able to win a men's world cup and will struggle to maintain our dominance in the women's game. We need to give our National team coaches the best skilled players in the world if we expect them to compete effectively against the world’s best teams.

There's a chicken or the egg thing going on here. You can have lots of u9-u15 teams with a few talented players who are excited about the game, playing with kids that maybe aren't so. The talented kids (and their parents) will gravitate towards other talented kids because its fun to play with kids who also are talented and excited about the game.

Talented players coming together training and playing together - that sounds like an "elite" team.

All the bad mouthing about anything to do with American soccer is just grousing by folks with an opinion - and we all have one. Whether we aren't as good at Spain or the Brazilians right now - yah, you're right, but we're getting better all the time. The number of Americans playing soccer at every level is going up. As we continue, we'll get to a point where we can compete with the best. Has that day come - no. Will it be here in the next WC cycle, probably not. But eight years from now or twelve years from now - I could see America not being satisfied with making the second round of the WC.

The area of American soccer I'm most intrigued with is the development of an American "style" of soccer. I don't know what that style might be? But I do think American culture, and how kids grow up in America, is different enough from the rest of the world that until we figure out our own way of playing soccer, we are going to be chasing all the other countries that grow up with the game.

I could be totally off base here, but I thought USA Soccer missed an extraordinary opportunity when it couldn't come to terms with Jurgen Klinsmen, the former German national team coach who lives (or did live) in California to be the MNT Coach. There a guy, I sensed, understood both the game at the highest level as well as American kids and culture. I thought with him, there might be the moment when American soccer made that great leap forward.

But the poobahs of USA Soccer saw it differently and we have Bob Bradley. He seems a decent enough guy, but inspiring is not a word I would use to describe him. And I wouldn't say our MNT, short of Landon's run for the ages last summer, has been particularly inspiring - kinda like the coach. The scuttlebutt I remember reading about USA Soccer decision to not hire Klinsman was that he wanted ability to make changes up and down American soccer from the national team all the way to the kiddy programs. I don't know if that's true, but I could easily see all those poobahs not wanting to give up their place in the food chain to some foreign hotshot - this is American soccer....

And American soccer is what we have for the moment. Lots of people starting clubs, fielding teams. Everyone doing there own thing, lots of opinions and the players doing the best they can to keep developing their game.

We'll get there. I bet when the current high school players are parents, the current crop of club DOCs and coaches and USA Soccer poobahs will be long gone and the new poobahs will have grown up with the game, just like those other countries, and we'll be going deep into the WC.

believe that because American kids typically do not grow up in soccer based cultures as the rest of the world does, we come to soccer "late", and...., there are so many other sports and things for kids to do.

Brad can be reached at Partpro@aol.com

[/QUOTE] Keep dreaming. Nobody in this country cares about soccer enough and the USSF is such an old boys network, they make the hacks in our state government look like they got their jobs legitamtely.

Even though I agree with some of the changes in training methods to develop individuals I still wonder why there is so much worry on the girls side. As a matter of fact, I think that if the U.S. Women made 10 different National teams that all 10 would be in the top 15 in the country. I've seen many girls youth international games/friendlies and the U.S. has dominated almost every single match. Of course other countries are developing good players but that's a good thing for everyone.

All the bad mouthing about anything to do with American soccer is just grousing by folks with an opinion - and we all have one. Whether we aren't as good at Spain or the Brazilians right now - yah, you're right, but we're getting better all the time.

Not on the women's side, Dude. Going down hill and fast.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Dude,

"We as a nation" ? You can't be serous.

US club soccer is a rich suburban kid's game. You are not scanning the vast majority of the population for the best players.

Sure the women had their World Cup run but, they are pretty much done now. Their last showing was a national embarassment. (I think they finished second ?)

In the US, World Cup Soccer is kind of like America's Cup Sailing; there is interest if your a legit contender to win. Otherwise, who cares.

Came in third after getting spanked by Brazil 4-0 in the semis. A single game and the only loss in his 45-1-9 record coaching the WNT led to the firing of Greg Ryan.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Even though I agree with some of the changes in training methods to develop individuals I still wonder why there is so much worry on the girls side. As a matter of fact, I think that if the U.S. Women made 10 different National teams that all 10 would be in the top 15 in the country. I've seen many girls youth international games/friendlies and the U.S. has dominated almost every single match. Of course other countries are developing good players but that's a good thing for everyone.

I am assuming you meant top 15 in the world and you know, I'd probably agree with you. But with the resources we have (pool of players, money spent) we should be dominating the field (and I mean not only in wins and losses, but quality of play), but we are not. We are producing very good athletes, but not great soccer players. We can do better.

The US women were most successful under Ansen Dorrance. Why...because he stresses individual skills and development, even in college.

If we want to run with the Big Dogs in the world cup arena, we can and should be looking at other, ore successful programs and strive ot improve. Making excuses and dissing articles like this, or other country's successful programs only makes the US soccer community look ignorant.

Dorrance might stress skills, but his recent UNC teams epitomize the US style. Go-go- go, high pressure, sub like hockey, 90 minutes of hell. He gets the absolute best players every year, and then places them in a style and system suited for less skilled, athletic, physical players. Only because the team was decimated by injuries this year did he shorten his bench and begin to play a more controlled, possession- oriented game. The team regained a rhythm and flow and begin to look like the UNC of old the previous poster referenced. His early success on the NT had more to do with few other countries embracing women's sports as it did to any great system, style or coaching.