Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Yale Coach
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNothing against the male coaches but so nice for Yale to have a trustworthy, female coach at this point.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, it's OK to prefer non-white, non-males over white males. You just can't do it the other way; that would be sexist or racist.
Look at the recent history related to female players at Yale. Three male coaches have recently negatively impacted yale women's soccer by disrespecting women's soccer with their actions.
1) Head coach selling roster spots to the highest bidder who students who don't even play competitive soccer.
His actions are not only illegal but disrespects all of the players on his team who trying to be the best they can be.
2) A well connected local coach sleeping with a recent former Yale player when she was a local minor. His excuse was he was in love and he did so much for her that at the time she was just overly grateful for all the help he did to get her into Yale.
So we really need to explain why this soo wrong
3) Coach who there are multiple reports that while coaching women at prior college coaching job he dated and had sexual relationships with players. And that his defense rests not on they never happened but they were always consensual and appropriate in the context of young male coaches and a young female player.
There are no claims he did anything directly to yale player but impact of his past actions is huge.
I can just see a recruiting meeting
Parent: Is someone on your staff coaching going try to have sex with our daughter? BF: Only if it's consensual. {yeah it's pretty clear his past action as coach at prior employment would have a negative impact as a coach to recruit young women}
If a female coach is better positioned to help break the cycle, so people understand how to correctly treat and respect these young female players then it's smart decision sensitive to gender dynamics.
No one is saying male coaches can't be great coaches for female teams. But if you don't take into account issue with gender differences to these recent events then your a fool.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYale got tired of white male coaches banging their players. And I am pretty sure a lot of "qualified" male coaches "disqualified" themselves buy their own past behavior while college women.
Look at the recent history related to female players at Yale. Three male coaches have recently negatively impacted yale women's soccer by disrespecting women's soccer with their actions.
1) Head coach selling roster spots to the highest bidder who students who don't even play competitive soccer.
His actions are not only illegal but disrespects all of the players on his team who trying to be the best they can be.
2) A well connected local coach sleeping with a recent former Yale player when she was a local minor. His excuse was he was in love and he did so much for her that at the time she was just overly grateful for all the help he did to get her into Yale.
So we really need to explain why this soo wrong
3) Coach who there are multiple reports that while coaching women at prior college coaching job he dated and had sexual relationships with players. And that his defense rests not on they never happened but they were always consensual and appropriate in the context of young male coaches and a young female player.
There are no claims he did anything directly to yale player but impact of his past actions is huge.
I can just see a recruiting meeting
Parent: Is someone on your staff coaching going try to have sex with our daughter? BF: Only if it's consensual. {yeah it's pretty clear his past action as coach at prior employment would have a negative impact as a coach to recruit young women}
If a female coach is better positioned to help break the cycle, so people understand how to correctly treat and respect these young female players then it's smart decision sensitive to gender dynamics.
No one is saying male coaches can't be great coaches for female teams. But if you don't take into account issue with gender differences to these recent events then your a fool.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYale got tired of white male coaches banging their players. And I am pretty sure a lot of "qualified" male coaches "disqualified" themselves buy their own past behavior while college women.
Look at the recent history related to female players at Yale. Three male coaches have recently negatively impacted yale women's soccer by disrespecting women's soccer with their actions.
1) Head coach selling roster spots to the highest bidder who students who don't even play competitive soccer.
His actions are not only illegal but disrespects all of the players on his team who trying to be the best they can be.
2) A well connected local coach sleeping with a recent former Yale player when she was a local minor. His excuse was he was in love and he did so much for her that at the time she was just overly grateful for all the help he did to get her into Yale.
So we really need to explain why this soo wrong
3) Coach who there are multiple reports that while coaching women at prior college coaching job he dated and had sexual relationships with players. And that his defense rests not on they never happened but they were always consensual and appropriate in the context of young male coaches and a young female player.
There are no claims he did anything directly to yale player but impact of his past actions is huge.
I can just see a recruiting meeting
Parent: Is someone on your staff coaching going try to have sex with our daughter? BF: Only if it's consensual. {yeah it's pretty clear his past action as coach at prior employment would have a negative impact as a coach to recruit young women}
If a female coach is better positioned to help break the cycle, so people understand how to correctly treat and respect these young female players then it's smart decision sensitive to gender dynamics.
No one is saying male coaches can't be great coaches for female teams. But if you don't take into account issue with gender differences to these recent events then your a fool.
Well said. Great hire for Yale. Bonus, she’s a female role model.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot sure #2 has much to do with Yale.
Adam's excuses for his relationship are creepily similar excuses people posted in defense of BF prior relationships. Yes, Adam's was with a minor but the same player-coach dynamic.
The impact was indirect and no fault of anyone at Yale but there is a connection your fool to think Yale athletic administration did not discuss this when it became public.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOkay, let me spell it out for you. Adam Allerton had close connections with several former Yale coaches and those connections were instrumental in helping that player get to Yale. It was a pretty public store that ran in that national news. This definitely popped up in Yale's athletic department radar as the news broke right after this players last season at yale.
Adam's excuses for his relationship are creepily similar excuses people posted in defense of BF prior relationships. Yes, Adam's was with a minor but the same player-coach dynamic.
The impact was indirect and no fault of anyone at Yale but there is a connection your fool to think Yale athletic administration did not discuss this when it became public.
As for this hire, don’t know the coach and don’t care. She could be terrific. She could be horrible. On paper, it is not a good hire and it is also not a good look to keep the staff on when the head coach is let go. That’s just common sense.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou’re an idiot and you sound unhinged. 1 and 3 I get, but 2 has nothing to do with the school whatsoever. The guy didn’t coach there did he? That has no more to do with Yale than if a kid on the team’s father was done for insider trading. You’re trying to hard.
As for this hire, don’t know the coach and don’t care. She could be terrific. She could be horrible. On paper, it is not a good hire and it is also not a good look to keep the staff on when the head coach is let go. That’s just common sense.
No way am I blaming Adam's action on CFC or even crazier yet Yale but to say there is no relationship b/w CFC coaches who were involved with Yale womens soccer for a long time and Adam who was instrumental in that player joining that Yale or Deny that Yale administration was not sensitive to this situation after the new broke your the fool.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
So I just want to get this correct....
You are judging men because of other men's bad actions? Sounds like a plan. Just curious if you judge other races and genders the same way?
So in your world.....
I should assume most black men have or will go to jail since, you know, they are 5 times more likely of going to jail.
I am part black and the fact that you are condemning all men because of the actions of 3 men is wrong.
I can see the sign in the ADs office now...
"Men need not apply"
Haven't we made progress?
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYale got tired of white male coaches banging their players. And I am pretty sure a lot of "qualified" male coaches "disqualified" themselves buy their own past behavior while college women.
Look at the recent history related to female players at Yale. Three male coaches have recently negatively impacted yale women's soccer by disrespecting women's soccer with their actions.
1) Head coach selling roster spots to the highest bidder who students who don't even play competitive soccer.
His actions are not only illegal but disrespects all of the players on his team who trying to be the best they can be.
2) A well connected local coach sleeping with a recent former Yale player when she was a local minor. His excuse was he was in love and he did so much for her that at the time she was just overly grateful for all the help he did to get her into Yale.
So we really need to explain why this soo wrong
3) Coach who there are multiple reports that while coaching women at prior college coaching job he dated and had sexual relationships with players. And that his defense rests not on they never happened but they were always consensual and appropriate in the context of young male coaches and a young female player.
There are no claims he did anything directly to yale player but impact of his past actions is huge.
I can just see a recruiting meeting
Parent: Is someone on your staff coaching going try to have sex with our daughter? BF: Only if it's consensual. {yeah it's pretty clear his past action as coach at prior employment would have a negative impact as a coach to recruit young women}
If a female coach is better positioned to help break the cycle, so people understand how to correctly treat and respect these young female players then it's smart decision sensitive to gender dynamics.
No one is saying male coaches can't be great coaches for female teams. But if you don't take into account issue with gender differences to these recent events then your a fool.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
So let's take the last line an put in different identifiers so you get the point....
It currently reads:
"No one is saying MALE coaches don't make great coaches for FEMALE teams. But if you don't take into account issue with GENDER differences to these recent events then your a fool."
Let us see if you agree with this:
"No one is saying BLACK coaches don't make great coaches for WHITE teams. But if you don't take into account issue with RACE differences to these recent events then your a fool."
People need to stop and actually think about things before they agree or disagree with things!
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYale got tired of white male coaches banging their players. And I am pretty sure a lot of "qualified" male coaches "disqualified" themselves buy their own past behavior while college women.
Look at the recent history related to female players at Yale. Three male coaches have recently negatively impacted yale women's soccer by disrespecting women's soccer with their actions.
1) Head coach selling roster spots to the highest bidder who students who don't even play competitive soccer.
His actions are not only illegal but disrespects all of the players on his team who trying to be the best they can be.
2) A well connected local coach sleeping with a recent former Yale player when she was a local minor. His excuse was he was in love and he did so much for her that at the time she was just overly grateful for all the help he did to get her into Yale.
So we really need to explain why this soo wrong
3) Coach who there are multiple reports that while coaching women at prior college coaching job he dated and had sexual relationships with players. And that his defense rests not on they never happened but they were always consensual and appropriate in the context of young male coaches and a young female player.
There are no claims he did anything directly to yale player but impact of his past actions is huge.
I can just see a recruiting meeting
Parent: Is someone on your staff coaching going try to have sex with our daughter? BF: Only if it's consensual. {yeah it's pretty clear his past action as coach at prior employment would have a negative impact as a coach to recruit young women}
If a female coach is better positioned to help break the cycle, so people understand how to correctly treat and respect these young female players then it's smart decision sensitive to gender dynamics.
No one is saying male coaches can't be great coaches for female teams. But if you don't take into account issue with gender differences to these recent events then your a fool.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo let's take the last line an put in different identifiers so you get the point....
It currently reads:
"No one is saying MALE coaches don't make great coaches for FEMALE teams. But if you don't take into account issue with GENDER differences to these recent events then your a fool."
Let us see if you agree with this:
"No one is saying BLACK coaches don't make great coaches for WHITE teams. But if you don't take into account issue with RACE differences to these recent events then your a fool."
People need to stop and actually think about things before they agree or disagree with things!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo I just want to get this correct....
You are judging men because of other men's bad actions? Sounds like a plan. Just curious if you judge other races and genders the same way?
So in your world.....
I should assume most black men have or will go to jail since, you know, they are 5 times more likely of going to jail.
I am part black and the fact that you are condemning all men because of the actions of 3 men is wrong.
I can see the sign in the ADs office now...
"Men need not apply"
Haven't we made progress?
I will say it again Men and women can both be great coaches for college women teams.
No one says males need not apply only ones that think it's okay to sleep their player or think so little about the sport they take bribes that directly hurt the team they have been trusted to coach.
- Quote
Comment
Comment