Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3v3 strategy
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post1-1-1 will not work . You are going to get exposed very very easy. You need to play two solid wings up top with your “point” back player needs to be the best with ball control. He is the eyes of the team. I’ve won multiple Disney championships.
1-1-1 should only be for defense. We called it the snake. It worked well because player 1 gives good pressure and player 2 cleans up. The trick is not to always show that you are playing the formation. We would line up with 2 wings and 1 back. If the team went left then the left wing was the head of the snake, player 1, and the other wing would fall in line. If they go right just switch. The position of player 2 was also important to disrupt passing lanes. The other thing that is important is if player 1 gets beat they need to hustle back into formation and be #2.
As to offense, it is most logical to always have one defender back and 2 attacking. The trick is to disguise which 2 are attacking and the non-attacking player to be responsible to protect their goal. It can be tough if a wing is too far out of position to cover the goal so you need the right players and positioning needs to be taught. Also we liked to attack with 2 players on one side of the field to overload pressure. sometimes sneak the sweeper into the open area. All to often it is 1 wing on the left and 1 wing on the right and they just pass the ball around the defense on the outside.
My favorite part of 3v3 was corner kicks. So many different tricks and set pieces you can have fun with.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThanks, although this sounds fundamentally sound I am a disruptor and it seems like the 1-1-1 would give the kids the most ability to be free and show their own style. If that does not work I for sure will revert to 2 in the back
And if your lone defender applies pressure, whose going to cover the goal.
All of these “creative” formations end the same way—someone has to cover the goal. So, why create all these extra steps to do so. More steps means more mistakes. And simple mistakes in 3V3 will get you killed. Unless you’re the superior team, you better stick with a conservative point and two strikers.
3V3 is about predictable defending and one touch diagonal counterattacks.
- Quote
Comment
Comment