Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
U16 Boys 2014-2015 98/99
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTo say TOP TEAM, beat every team consistently with a 3 to 4 goal difference. Then you may earn the bragging rights. Until then, nomads are equal or far better than you all!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf you did watch the game, you'd easily be able to tell Rush was the better side in terms of play and players, Nomads just kept it compact and didn't budge up easily. It happens, teams draw, lose and tie. You don't need to give us some analytical report degrading a top team in the state to just some OK side. More often then not, if you have watched rush consistently over the past years, they've always been about team play and not being individuals or pounding easy teams. They are a team that rises to the occasion and play there best against the best. I know of several of there players who someone with blind eyes like you wouldn't consider "superstars", transition to DA and do very well for themselves. If we we're watching the same game Nomads vs Rush, then it was easy to tell the lack of quality in Nomads but organization and the better team being Rush. Nomads had one real good opportunity, but let's not forget a dubious goal was disallowed because it apparently didn't cross the line (which it did) and the Rush striker fluffed some easy chances.
If I had to actually tell you the main dilemma with Rush right now, it is the fact that there defenders don't play out of the back consistently enough. The midfielder they added is quality and the winger from GTBFC are two good technical players, but if they don't play out of the back then they become useless, that's why right now Real Madrid is the better side. A lot more chemistry, a lot better style of play is the difference between RMA and Rush, but Rush does have a lot of potential. Nomads got a 0-0 result, let's leave it at that. Everyone's going to fluctuate throughout the season, there's no shame in DRAWING an improved Nomads side.
People think there are no star players in Rush, they don't know about this winger yet!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf you did watch the game, you'd easily be able to tell Rush was the better side in terms of play and players, Nomads just kept it compact and didn't budge up easily. It happens, teams draw, lose and tie. You don't need to give us some analytical report degrading a top team in the state to just some OK side. More often then not, if you have watched rush consistently over the past years, they've always been about team play and not being individuals or pounding easy teams. They are a team that rises to the occasion and play there best against the best. I know of several of there players who someone with blind eyes like you wouldn't consider "superstars", transition to DA and do very well for themselves. If we we're watching the same game Nomads vs Rush, then it was easy to tell the lack of quality in Nomads but organization and the better team being Rush. Nomads had one real good opportunity, but let's not forget a dubious goal was disallowed because it apparently didn't cross the line (which it did) and the Rush striker fluffed some easy chances.
If I had to actually tell you the main dilemma with Rush right now, it is the fact that there defenders don't play out of the back consistently enough. The midfielder they added is quality and the winger from GTBFC are two good technical players, but if they don't play out of the back then they become useless, that's why right now Real Madrid is the better side. A lot more chemistry, a lot better style of play is the difference between RMA and Rush, but Rush does have a lot of potential. Nomads got a 0-0 result, let's leave it at that. Everyone's going to fluctuate throughout the season, there's no shame in DRAWING an improved Nomads side.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Nomads missed at least 3-4 golden opportunities early in the game. Granted Rush keeper made 1 quality save on one of those.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNomads missed at least 3-4 golden opportunities early in the game. Granted Rush keeper made 1 quality save on one of those.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'm a Rush parent and to be fair, Rush was marginally better and only when the Nomad's coach started putting their subs in did we started to dominate. Nomads is a competitive team as long as you keep the first team on the pitch. But they have a very weak bench and that's what's holding them back now. That tall kid that was playing in the center of the field was very weak and clumsy, if that's all you have then you're in trouble. Rush has consistency on the pitch and on the bench and that makes the difference.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDefine "NOT playing out of the back. Do you mean tactical long ball placement? or just kickball?"
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgree about the GTBFC winger. Without him, that team is falling apart this year.
People think there are no star players in Rush, they don't know about this winger yet!
- Quote
Comment
Comment