Top Dap 04 clubs in New England Divison.

[Unregistered]

After viewing this. Are you suggesting that there are fewer than 10 good players in the boys 2004's? That's not many.

He's saying he is from the Bolts. Look at the results and compare to his outburst. New England u12 teams are comparable but it hardly matters. Revs and Bolts scoop up the best.

[Unregistered]

Bayside= Crap soccer, awful coaching and 2 good players.
Seacoast= Decent soccer, faring quite well for a team w mostly 05s and 06s.
Nefc= Talented players, well coached, but poor team soccer.
Oakwood= Decent soccer, many 04s playing up, well coached.
Valeo= horrific soccer, untalented players, poorly coached but they manage to get results by booting it up the field.
GPS= Poor soccer, few good players, well coached, shouldn't be in DA.
Bolts= Talented Players, Talented team, well coached, inconsistent.

Revs, Seacoast & Bolts take 20 each for "U14" (this designation will be retired)/ '04. plus '05s will be U13 next year so additional '05 U12s may also be taken this year.
Seems like at least 75% of these kids will automatically be on a DAP team regardless of quality. :(

[Unregistered]

Revs, Seacoast & Bolts take 20 each for "U14" (this designation will be retired)/ '04. plus '05s will be U13 next year so additional '05 U12s may also be taken this year.
Seems like at least 75% of these kids will automatically be on a DAP team regardless of quality. :(

You may want to check your math. U12 DA clubs carry 26 players each that they split into 2 squads.

Revs, Seacoast & Bolts will probably carry 17-18 max when they go 11v11(though Revs seem to carry way more right now).

Seacoast isn't close so no one south of the Mass Pike will consider them.

Revs will have the most turnover but they will also steal players from outside DA.

The Bolts seem pretty deep already so they won't take that many new players.

That leaves a lot of kids on the outside looking in. That means malcontent parents poisoning the sidelines at Bayside, GPS, NEFC & Valeo next Fall.

[Unregistered]

You may want to check your math. U12 DA clubs carry 26 players each that they split into 2 squads.



That leaves a lot of kids on the outside looking in. That means malcontent parents poisoning the sidelines at Bayside, GPS, NEFC & Valeo next Fall.

If your kid isn't playing DAP at u13 it's not happening, aside from a very few Revs additions.

[Unregistered]

If your kid isn't playing DAP at u13 it's not happening, aside from a very few Revs additions.

All the top players are already in place at U13?
There aren't any players that chose not
to play on a DAP team that are better than some that have?

[Unregistered]

All the top players are already in place at U13?
There aren't any players that chose not
to play on a DAP team that are better than some that have?

Yes.

No.

[Unregistered]

Yes.

No.

You need to get out more.

[Unregistered]

Yes.

No.

Troll alert.

[Unregistered]

Bayside= Crap soccer, awful coaching and 2 good players.
Seacoast= Decent soccer, faring quite well for a team w mostly 05s and 06s.
Nefc= Talented players, well coached, but poor team soccer.
Oakwood= Decent soccer, many 04s playing up, well coached.
Valeo= horrific soccer, untalented players, poorly coached but they manage to get results by booting it up the field.
GPS= Poor soccer, few good players, well coached, shouldn't be in DA.
Bolts= Talented Players, Talented team, well coached, inconsistent.

Seacoast Boys 2004 team is composed of mostly 05's and 06's? Why would their roster have all their dob's listed as 2004?

[Unregistered]

Seacoast Boys 2004 team is composed of mostly 05's and 06's? Why would their roster have all their dob's listed as 2004?

Both wrong, roster shows exactly a third of the team is '05-'06s, two-thirds are '04s.

[Unregistered]

Both wrong, roster shows exactly a third of the team is '05-'06s, two-thirds are '04s.

One 04 plays primarily with the 03s. Do any other teams have 06s?

[Unregistered]

One 04 plays primarily with the 03s. Do any other teams have 06s?

One 06 on Seacoast. Must be special?

[Unregistered]

Another thing is that many of these u12 teams have their top players play age appropriate; rather than up.

The Bolts have a player who is clearly good enough, and MORE than physically capable, of STARTING for their u13's. Why isn't he playing up?

The Rev affiliate clubs who only have Academy status up to U12 (GPS, NEFC, Valeo, Bayside) also keep many of their best players age appropriate. They do this because their club's u13 offering is not as good or competitive as u12 Academy.

[Unregistered]

Another thing is that many of these u12 teams have their top players play age appropriate; rather than up.

The Bolts have a player who is clearly good enough, and MORE than physically capable, of STARTING for their u13's. Why isn't he playing up?

The Rev affiliate clubs who only have Academy status up to U12 (GPS, NEFC, Valeo, Bayside) also keep many of their best players age appropriate. They do this because their club's u13 offering is not as good or competitive as u12 Academy.

Revs have the BEST program hands down

[Unregistered]

Revs have the BEST program hands down

Especially when you take into account that they let their players leave for better training opportunities during the Winter break. It's the best of both worlds.