Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
D1 Women's Soccer Top 10 all New England
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
ACC after 2
#1 - Duke 6 2-0 1.000 9-1 0.900 (Pitt, Louisville, NC State, FL State, Miami, BC, Syracuse, Virginia) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#2 - Wake Forest 6 2-0 1.000 8-1-1 0.850 (BC, ND, VA Tech, UNC, FL State, Louisville, Clemson, Miami) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#3 - North Carolina 6 2-0 1.000 6-2 0.750 (VA, Syracuse, Miami, Wake Forest, BC, Louisville, ND) - 3 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#4 - NC State 4 1-0-1 0.750 8-1-1 0.850 (ND, FL State, Duke, Pitt, Syracuse, Clemson, VA Tech, Louisville) - 5 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#5 - Virginia 4 1-0-1 0.750 6-2-2 0.700 (UNC, Pitt, ND, Louisville, Clemson, Syracuse, BC, Duke) - 4 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 2 against top tier contenders
#6 - Florida State 3 1-1 0.500 6-2 0.750 (VA Tech, NC State, BC, Duke, Wake Forest, ND, Pitt, Clemson) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#7 - Boston College 3 1-1 0.500 7-4 0.636 ( Wake Forest, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC, Duke, VA, Pitt) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#8 - Notre Dame 3 1-1 0.500 5-3-2 0.600 (NC State, Wake Forest, VA, Syracuse, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
_______________________________________
#9 - Virginia Tech 1 0-1-1 0.250 6-2-2 0.700
#10 - Pittsburgh 1 0-1-1 0.250 3-4-3 0.450
#11 - Miami 0 0-1 0.000 4-3 0.571
#12 - Syracuse 0 0-1 0.000 4-3-1 0.563
#13 - Clemson 0 0-2 0.000 6-3 0.667
#14 - Louisville 0 0-2 0.000 5-4 0.556
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Most common post on this thread:
I'm not an Eagles fan, BUT.....
Self -righteous indignation to follow.
LOL!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostACC after 2
#1 - Duke 6 2-0 1.000 9-1 0.900 (Pitt, Louisville, NC State, FL State, Miami, BC, Syracuse, Virginia) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#2 - Wake Forest 6 2-0 1.000 8-1-1 0.850 (BC, ND, VA Tech, UNC, FL State, Louisville, Clemson, Miami) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#3 - North Carolina 6 2-0 1.000 6-2 0.750 (VA, Syracuse, Miami, Wake Forest, BC, Louisville, ND) - 3 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#4 - NC State 4 1-0-1 0.750 8-1-1 0.850 (ND, FL State, Duke, Pitt, Syracuse, Clemson, VA Tech, Louisville) - 5 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#5 - Virginia 4 1-0-1 0.750 6-2-2 0.700 (UNC, Pitt, ND, Louisville, Clemson, Syracuse, BC, Duke) - 4 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 2 against top tier contenders
#6 - Florida State 3 1-1 0.500 6-2 0.750 (VA Tech, NC State, BC, Duke, Wake Forest, ND, Pitt, Clemson) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#7 - Boston College 3 1-1 0.500 7-4 0.636 ( Wake Forest, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC, Duke, VA, Pitt) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#8 - Notre Dame 3 1-1 0.500 5-3-2 0.600 (NC State, Wake Forest, VA, Syracuse, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
_______________________________________
#9 - Virginia Tech 1 0-1-1 0.250 6-2-2 0.700
#10 - Pittsburgh 1 0-1-1 0.250 3-4-3 0.450
#11 - Miami 0 0-1 0.000 4-3 0.571
#12 - Syracuse 0 0-1 0.000 4-3-1 0.563
#13 - Clemson 0 0-2 0.000 6-3 0.667
#14 - Louisville 0 0-2 0.000 5-4 0.556
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhy'd you presume I'm an Eagles fan? But hey, thanks for intelligently answering my question!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe leading goal scorer in the ACC decides it's time to end this. Plows through the midfield, makes a turn, and nails the long range shot for her seventh goal of the season. Nice to have one of those.
Is that what we're calling terrible defending and game awareness these days???
Spare me apologists, but multiple players, that area of the field, against that player, at that time of the match = totally inexcusable.
https://twitter.com/PackWSoccer/stat...46993522372609
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAbsolutely fantastic finish, but...
Is that what we're calling terrible defending and game awareness these days???
Spare me apologists, but multiple players, that area of the field, against that player, at that time of the match = totally inexcusable.
https://twitter.com/PackWSoccer/stat...46993522372609
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI checked out the pair which double teamed her during the play. She waded right through them. They were both lightly used subs, a sophomore fwd and a freshman. Why are they on the field at crunch time?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou're kidding right? One started 4 games, was a U18 NT player another was an ECNL Id2 player. The players seemed to be stuck in cement. Is fitness still a thing at the Heights?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostACC after 2
#1 - Duke 6 2-0 1.000 9-1 0.900 (Pitt, Louisville, NC State, FL State, Miami, BC, Syracuse, Virginia) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#2 - Wake Forest 6 2-0 1.000 8-1-1 0.850 (BC, ND, VA Tech, UNC, FL State, Louisville, Clemson, Miami) - 4 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#3 - North Carolina 6 2-0 1.000 6-2 0.750 (VA, Syracuse, Miami, Wake Forest, BC, Louisville, ND) - 3 against non contenders 3 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#4 - NC State 4 1-0-1 0.750 8-1-1 0.850 (ND, FL State, Duke, Pitt, Syracuse, Clemson, VA Tech, Louisville) - 5 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 1 against top tier contenders
#5 - Virginia 4 1-0-1 0.750 6-2-2 0.700 (UNC, Pitt, ND, Louisville, Clemson, Syracuse, BC, Duke) - 4 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 2 against top tier contenders
#6 - Florida State 3 1-1 0.500 6-2 0.750 (VA Tech, NC State, BC, Duke, Wake Forest, ND, Pitt, Clemson) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#7 - Boston College 3 1-1 0.500 7-4 0.636 ( Wake Forest, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC, Duke, VA, Pitt) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
#8 - Notre Dame 3 1-1 0.500 5-3-2 0.600 (NC State, Wake Forest, VA, Syracuse, VA Tech, FL State, Miami, UNC) - 3 against non contenders 2 against second tier contenders, 3 against top tier contenders
_______________________________________
#9 - Virginia Tech 1 0-1-1 0.250 6-2-2 0.700
#10 - Pittsburgh 1 0-1-1 0.250 3-4-3 0.450
#11 - Miami 0 0-1 0.000 4-3 0.571
#12 - Syracuse 0 0-1 0.000 4-3-1 0.563
#13 - Clemson 0 0-2 0.000 6-3 0.667
#14 - Louisville 0 0-2 0.000 5-4 0.556
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAt that level, if you are putting kids with just ECNL id2 on the field you are going to lose. That simple.
- Quote
Comment
Comment