Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oakwood DA v. Scorpions ECNL scrimmages
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere isn't much difference between the clubs at most age groups. I don't have a daughter playing on these teams but I've observed many of the scrimmages and league games (where they have played) and the teams stack up as follows based on how they play and talent not necessarily the outcomes.
U14 (talent fairly evenly split)
1) FSA ECNL slight advantage over
2) OW DA slight advantage over
3) CFC ECNL
U15
1) CFC ECNL
2) OW DA slight advantage over
3) FSA ECNL (although FSA picked up a couple OW DA players)
U16 (cant judge DA given combined age group)
1) FSA ECNL slight advantage over
2) CFC ECNL
U17 (cant judge DA given combined age group)
1) CFC ECNL strong advantage over
2) FSA ECNL
haven't observed U18 enough
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
It rained here all day and it was in the 30s.
Oakwood are idiots for even dragging kids out there in that. What’s the point?
Local colleges played today as well. (Indoors)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt rained here all day and it was in the 30s.
Oakwood are idiots for even dragging kids out there in that. What’s the point?
Local colleges played today as well. (Indoors)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt rained here all day and it was in the 30s.
Oakwood are idiots for even dragging kids out there in that. What’s the point?
Local colleges played today as well. (Indoors)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere isn't much difference between the clubs at most age groups. I don't have a daughter playing on these teams but I've observed many of the scrimmages and league games (where they have played) and the teams stack up as follows based on how they play and talent not necessarily the outcomes.
U14 (talent fairly evenly split)
1) FSA ECNL slight advantage over
2) OW DA slight advantage over
3) CFC ECNL
U15
1) CFC ECNL
2) OW DA slight advantage over
3) FSA ECNL (although FSA picked up a couple OW DA players)
U16 (cant judge DA given combined age group)
1) FSA ECNL slight advantage over
2) CFC ECNL
U17 (cant judge DA given combined age group)
1) CFC ECNL strong advantage over
2) FSA ECNL
haven't observed U18 enough
FSA 2004 v Manhattan - 3-0
FSA 2003 ECNL V Manhattan - 3-1
FSA 2003 NPL v CT Rush - 0-2
FSA 2001 v Manhattan 1-2
Wet day but not too bad as far as game conditions. 2004 game was closer than score shows. Not much difference in the sides but FSA definitely stronger than an average Manhattan team. The 2003 ECNL team earned a debatable PK in first half to go up 1-0. Prior to that Manhattan looked the better side. Second half was back and forth, Manhattan scores a consolation in last couple of minutes of game. FSA NPL team is very weak. Don’t think they got it over midfield once. Score could have been 12-0 if Rush could finish their chances. Possibly 20 corner kicks in that game. 2001 Manhattan looked much stronger than FSA.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCouple of scrimmages at FSA as well. Quality facilities, best in CT:
FSA 2004 v Manhattan - 3-0
FSA 2003 ECNL V Manhattan - 3-1
FSA 2003 NPL v CT Rush - 0-2
FSA 2001 v Manhattan 1-2
Wet day but not too bad as far as game conditions. 2004 game was closer than score shows. Not much difference in the sides but FSA definitely stronger than an average Manhattan team. The 2003 ECNL team earned a debatable PK in first half to go up 1-0. Prior to that Manhattan looked the better side. Second half was back and forth, Manhattan scores a consolation in last couple of minutes of game. FSA NPL team is very weak. Don’t think they got it over midfield once. Score could have been 12-0 if Rush could finish their chances. Possibly 20 corner kicks in that game. 2001 Manhattan looked much stronger than FSA.
-CFC Parent
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCouple of scrimmages at FSA as well. Quality facilities, best in CT:
FSA 2004 v Manhattan - 3-0
FSA 2003 ECNL V Manhattan - 3-1
FSA 2003 NPL v CT Rush - 0-2
FSA 2001 v Manhattan 1-2
Wet day but not too bad as far as game conditions. 2004 game was closer than score shows. Not much difference in the sides but FSA definitely stronger than an average Manhattan team. The 2003 ECNL team earned a debatable PK in first half to go up 1-0. Prior to that Manhattan looked the better side. Second half was back and forth, Manhattan scores a consolation in last couple of minutes of game. FSA NPL team is very weak. Don’t think they got it over midfield once. Score could have been 12-0 if Rush could finish their chances. Possibly 20 corner kicks in that game. 2001 Manhattan looked much stronger than FSA.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt’s great most local clubs got in some scrimmages this weekend, who cares about scores as it is a scrimmage. I wish CFC wasn’t afraid to play other clubs in the area. Only the crappy Saturday CFC only indoor scrimmages. My kid is getting so much better scrimmaging against the 14-15 NPL teams
-CFC Parent
- Quote
Comment
Comment