Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BS is BS

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    So if he's the technical director, how is he banned?
    Not buying it.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      So if he's the technical director, how is he banned?
      Not buying it.
      banned from coaching perhaps? but like all else it wouldn't stop him from putting his two cents at all times (kind of like how he has a "board" but it's in name only)

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        22K for a coach? WHERE ?

        Most clubs pay 10-15K for a coach, BS is right around 15. Never heard of a club paying 22k.
        Remember MK stretches his money and all those coaches are expected to "volunteer" Mickey Kydes soccer camps. 6 weeks of unpaid hell. Makes your for profit venture particularly profitable when you don't have any expenses.

        Comment


          BS and Kydes

          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          So if he's the technical director, how is he banned?
          Not buying it.
          If he is barred from USSF, then he can't participate in their 'activities' but being the TD of a club is an internal decision, has nothing to do with USSF. Being the TD NOT the Academy Director are very different roles.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            If he is barred from USSF, then he can't participate in their 'activities' but being the TD of a club is an internal decision, has nothing to do with USSF. Being the TD NOT the Academy Director are very different roles.
            That rule comes from a particular source? Or is that just your opinion?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              False.

              I negotiate my own contract with the club that I coach for and my contract includes a seasonal year stipend, hotel accommodations, mileage for tournaments and any games more than 50 miles from our home club field and a daily meal per diem for tournaments.
              wow you are in the big leagues now. You should spend more time seeking out a real job

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                banned from coaching perhaps? but like all else it wouldn't stop him from putting his two cents at all times (kind of like how he has a "board" but it's in name only)
                If BS (the 501-c-3 entity) did anything funky with their finances, it would be the board of directors that would be held responsible (by the IRS). The board of directors of a not for profit are the principals of that organization.
                In reality MK could be calling shots, I'm not disputing that. But when legal problems come along, it is the board that is on the hook.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  If BS (the 501-c-3 entity) did anything funky with their finances, it would be the board of directors that would be held responsible (by the IRS). The board of directors of a not for profit are the principals of that organization.
                  In reality MK could be calling shots, I'm not disputing that. But when legal problems come along, it is the board that is on the hook.
                  USSF is doing the banning

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    So if he's the technical director, how is he banned?
                    Not buying it.
                    And a Beachside Technical Director is?

                    Please explain his job not the definition of the TD.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      USSF is doing the banning
                      For financial issues at the not for profit entity, which administers over the DA program?

                      I think they would ban the whole program, or the treasurer of the board. Is MK even on the board?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        And a Beachside Technical Director is?

                        Please explain his job not the definition of the TD.
                        It's technically a job which directs money into Bank accounts, buys hair gel and drives nice cars. Oh an yells at coaches

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          USSF is doing the banning
                          Yes two separate issues - anything in front of the IRS vs USSF. The IRS doesn't care about USSF just financial filings, compliance etc. But USSF cares about the IRS. Clubs have very detailed financial rules and also want to protect their image.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            It's technically a job which directs money into Bank accounts, buys hair gel and drives nice cars. Oh an yells at coaches
                            He's the man for the job then.

                            Comment


                              BS is BS

                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              That rule comes from a particular source? Or is that just your opinion?
                              Just my opinion, makes sense.

                              Comment


                                Problems

                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                If BS (the 501-c-3 entity) did anything funky with their finances, it would be the board of directors that would be held responsible (by the IRS). The board of directors of a not for profit are the principals of that organization.
                                In reality MK could be calling shots, I'm not disputing that. But when legal problems come along, it is the board that is on the hook.
                                With regards to the IRS, absolutely correct. With regards to the USSF, think that falls on individuals who are licensed reps of that organization. In fact I know that.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X