Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ecnl-da-npl-edp

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ecnl-da-npl-edp

    It would seem to me after reading these various threadsthat in CT:

    CFC ECNL has the Best 18 PLayers and will play against the best competition.

    FSA ECNL will play against the best competition and their top 6-7 players could make/play at CFC.

    Oakwood DA has 1-2 players that could make CFC ECNL and plays against the second best set of teams, these players are mostly interchangeable with FSA ECNL team. For kids who have a science teacher as a high school coach an option to play year round.

    CFC-NPL, Oakwood NPL, Yankee NPL, and players are interchangeable and competition is about equal but below ECNL and DA

    It seems to me that all of these programs are able to provide pathways to make various college level teams if the kids choose to pursue. Am I missing anything?

    #2
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    It would seem to me after reading these various threadsthat in CT:

    CFC ECNL has the Best 18 PLayers and will play against the best competition.

    FSA ECNL will play against the best competition and their top 6-7 players could make/play at CFC.

    Oakwood DA has 1-2 players that could make CFC ECNL and plays against the second best set of teams, these players are mostly interchangeable with FSA ECNL team. For kids who have a science teacher as a high school coach an option to play year round.

    CFC-NPL, Oakwood NPL, Yankee NPL, and players are interchangeable and competition is about equal but below ECNL and DA

    It seems to me that all of these programs are able to provide pathways to make various college level teams if the kids choose to pursue. Am I missing anything?

    Not far off. Not all of CFC's teams have the top talent. OW would take of CFC at U15. The NPL stuff would vary by age. CFC has a good U17 NPL team, Oakwood and Yankee have good U16 teams.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      It would seem to me after reading these various threadsthat in CT:

      CFC ECNL has the Best 18 PLayers and will play against the best competition.

      FSA ECNL will play against the best competition and their top 6-7 players could make/play at CFC.

      Oakwood DA has 1-2 players that could make CFC ECNL and plays against the second best set of teams, these players are mostly interchangeable with FSA ECNL team. For kids who have a science teacher as a high school coach an option to play year round.

      CFC-NPL, Oakwood NPL, Yankee NPL, and players are interchangeable and competition is about equal but below ECNL and DA

      It seems to me that all of these programs are able to provide pathways to make various college level teams if the kids choose to pursue. Am I missing anything?

      Yes, you are missing a lot. what is providing a pathway? College level is a massive spread in talent. Your comments about "best competition" make no sense at all.

      Comment


        #4
        Like colleges, there's a level of play for everyone that fits their goals, time and budget. Pick whatever works best for your kid.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          It would seem to me after reading these various threadsthat in CT:

          CFC ECNL has the Best 18 PLayers and will play against the best competition.

          FSA ECNL will play against the best competition and their top 6-7 players could make/play at CFC.

          Oakwood DA has 1-2 players that could make CFC ECNL and plays against the second best set of teams, these players are mostly interchangeable with FSA ECNL team. For kids who have a science teacher as a high school coach an option to play year round.

          CFC-NPL, Oakwood NPL, Yankee NPL, and players are interchangeable and competition is about equal but below ECNL and DA

          It seems to me that all of these programs are able to provide pathways to make various college level teams if the kids choose to pursue. Am I missing anything?
          How do you rate FSA ahead of OW? Their two oldest teams played in March and OW killed them. KILLED THEM .... DESTROYED THEM ...... NOT EVEN CLOSE ... DOMINATED! How do you suggest FSA has any better players when they couldn't touch the ball. As the season is wearing on, it would not surprise me if OW could beat CFC in the top two age groups as well. Sorry, just calling it like I see it and I am not an OW parent. FSA is just bad across the board and deserves to be discussed (on the girls side) as just some run of the mill NPL team. ECNL badge or not, they are clearly not in the top 2 in this state.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            How do you rate FSA ahead of OW? Their two oldest teams played in March and OW killed them. KILLED THEM .... DESTROYED THEM ...... NOT EVEN CLOSE ... DOMINATED! How do you suggest FSA has any better players when they couldn't touch the ball. As the season is wearing on, it would not surprise me if OW could beat CFC in the top two age groups as well. Sorry, just calling it like I see it and I am not an OW parent. FSA is just bad across the board and deserves to be discussed (on the girls side) as just some run of the mill NPL team. ECNL badge or not, they are clearly not in the top 2 in this state.
            Not with Ow huh? You’re not with CFC based on your commentary, so you’re with FSA? So you actually go and watch all these teams play?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Not with Ow huh? You’re not with CFC based on your commentary, so you’re with FSA? So you actually go and watch all these teams play?
              Hear a lot on here and watched some of the video on youtube ..... FSA is awful.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Hear a lot on here and watched some of the video on youtube ..... FSA is awful.
                Not disputing that, but you can’t really base your supposition on what you’re hearing on TS and watching “some” of a video can you?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Not disputing that, but you can’t really base your supposition on what you’re hearing on TS and watching “some” of a video can you?
                  No. But, I can use those things to troll on TS. OW rulez!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Not disputing that, but you can’t really base your supposition on what you’re hearing on TS and watching “some” of a video can you?
                    I have also seen FSA teams play many times and I am not impressed by any means, sorry. They really struggle with teams anywhere near as athletic as they are that can play even just a little soccer.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      It would seem to me after reading these various threadsthat in CT:

                      CFC ECNL has the Best 18 PLayers and will play against the best competition.
                      Let's not go ^^this far^^. Let's leave it that some of CFC's teams may have the most depth for a starting 11. There are many kids not on CFC teams that can play.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Small state with too many "top" clubs diluting talent and resources. It's one reason CT teams don't do much at the regional and certainly national level. CFC doesn't have a lock on the top talent but does have more of it than FSA or OW

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I tell parents ,I really don't like to go FSA.Theyre awesome.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            From another state and team that played cfc and fsa last year and oakwood this year. 00 age. I can tell you for sure, by not only scoreline but also run of play, Oakwood is by far the best at that age. FSA was terrible and CFC slightly better than terrible. I know the cfc younger teams were slightly better.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              From another state and team that played cfc and fsa last year and oakwood this year. 00 age. I can tell you for sure, by not only scoreline but also run of play, Oakwood is by far the best at that age. FSA was terrible and CFC slightly better than terrible. I know the cfc younger teams were slightly better.
                              Except ECNL and GDA don’t play outside clubs. Maybe you played against a branch team and don’t know the difference?

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X