Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What would happen if the US's best athletes played soccer?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    What would happen if the US's best athletes played soccer?

    Interesting article on many levels.

    "For at least a decade, every World Cup cycle has brought up the same hypothetical among casual fans: What would happen if the United States’s best athletes played soccer? If you could take an NBA point guard or an NFL corner and turn back time and put a soccer ball at his feet, what would happen? With Yedlin, a bottle rocket of right-flank speed and power, we’re now starting to find out.

    ...DeAndre Yedlin played baseball, basketball, and football as a kid, but his first experience with organized sports came on a soccer field. No matter what sport Yedlin tried, he dominated. He was smaller than most kids, but faster than them all. On the basketball court, he could dribble past everyone for an open layup; on the baseball diamond, he would embarrass opposing fielders in rundowns, leaving them flailing at him with their gloves as he zipped by on his way to the next base.

    Today, it’s easy to look at Yedlin — 5-foot-8 and thick-chested, and able to outrun the best soccer players in the world — and imagine him on an NFL roster...In college, Yedlin was clocked at about 4.2 seconds in the 40-yard dash. And, says his college coach, Caleb Porter, “It’s about a lot more than top-end speed. It’s his burst, his ability to go from a jog to a sprint before you even realize what has just happened.” His athleticism, Porter says, “is truly world-class.” It would have made sense for Yedlin to play football. He inhabits a cornerback’s body in an age when cornerbacks can command $70 million contracts.

    ...Yedlin joined the Sounders’ youth academy...Training was detached from schools and put in the hands of clubs, which taught talented players how to be professionals and to prioritize soccer above everything. Yedlin loved it. And yet, he continued to play for his school. Once, he played an out-of-state game with the Sounders on a Friday, then flew home to Seattle the next morning in time to drive from the airport to an O’Dea game he could enter at halftime.

    ...unlike many other young American players — Agudelo, Altidore, and Shea among them — Yedlin went to college. He enrolled at the University of Akron, more than 2,000 miles from home. There, he played for Caleb Porter, a coach who had no pretensions about the sanctity of college sports. “I was preparing my players to be pros,” Porter says. “The way I ran my program was similar to the way John Calipari runs his [basketball] program at Kentucky. They came to play for me because they wanted to be pros and because I let them know that I wanted them to be pros, too. Everything we did — from the way we trained to the schedule we kept to our nutrition and everything else — everything was about winning, yes, but also about getting these guys ready for life as professional soccer players.”

    ...Yedlin’s athletic growth mirrored the typical American experience — soccer as a young child, Little League baseball as an older boy, football as a postadolescent, single-sport specialization in high school, then college, then the pros. But along the way, he took advantage of advancements in American soccer’s infrastructure — playing for elite youth clubs, then the Sounders’ academy, then going back to the club that trained him through a rule designed for cases like his.

    And if some of Yedlin’s success can be attributed to the growth of soccer culture in America, some of his shortcomings can be attributed to that same culture’s flaws. In the past, an athlete of Yedlin’s caliber would have been less likely to focus on soccer. But here’s the short version of any Yedlin scouting report: Strengths: Athleticism, fearlessness. Weaknesses: Everything else. Yedlin didn’t even really begin sharpening his technique until he arrived at Akron. “He was always a freak athlete,” says his uncle Dylan. “Akron was where he really learned the game.”

    Americans — especially during the World Cup — like to wonder what would happen if our greatest athletes played soccer. But as with any other sport, speed and agility can only take a player so far...

    Some have suggested that Yedlin move full time to midfield. But his skill set, built on quickness and speed more than creativity and technique, would have a defined ceiling if he moved farther upfield. “Could he be a winger? Yeah, sure,” Porter says. “But when you look at the top wingers, he’s never going to be more technical and more clever off the dribble and in his combination and movement than those guys are. He just doesn’t have that. But at right back? With his athleticism, bombing forward, going box to box? Right now, this is just the tip of the iceberg. I mean, he obviously already looks like the right back of the future for our national team. Beyond that, he can be a Champions League right back. He can be that good.” The difference, says Porter: At age 21, it may already be too late to master the finer points of midfield technique. But defending? “Yeah,” Porter says, “that can definitely be taught.”

    Soon, it seems, a foreign coach will have that responsibility. As of this morning, Yedlin’s future remains uncertain. In recent weeks, he has been linked to clubs ranging from Liverpool to Roma to Napoli. The latest reports have him finishing the season in Seattle, then going to Tottenham."

    http://grantland.com/features/deandr...ub-mls-soccer/

    #2
    They already do, in ECNL

    Comment


      #3
      Americans — especially during the World Cup — like to wonder what would happen if our greatest athletes played soccer. But as with any other sport, speed and agility can only take a player so far...
      That's the answer.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        They already do, in ECNL
        Yes, imagine if they played linebacker instead of boot ball !

        Comment


          #5
          They'd be a lot skinnier.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            They already do, in ECNL
            Do people like you really believe that ECNL is all that?

            Comment


              #7
              The "best athletes" conversation is mostly a topic on the mens side. The women cannot make the same excuse.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                The "best athletes" conversation is mostly a topic on the mens side. The women cannot make the same excuse.
                I wonder why then, that both the men and the women's programs have the same weaknesses.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I wonder why then, that both the men and the women's programs have the same weaknesses.
                  I think that's perfectly understandable. Having the same weaknesses doesn't translate into the same results when, in one case, you have the elite athletes and, in the other case, you don't.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The result would likely be the same as in the LLWS, what have our best athletes lost now, 4 out of the last 5 years???? The problem with soccer is that kids only play in a supervised environment and there is no culture to support the constant play and game watching that occurs in the rest of the world. That is how kids develop creativity and skills, not by doing drills 2-4 times a week.

                    Hell, Switzerland consistently fields a very strong national team (which should have beaten Argentina in the WC) and has many players playing in the best leagues around the world and they have a total population of 8 million!

                    Do people honestly think that they have more gifted athletes playing soccer than the entire USA with 300 million plus a bunch of undocumented aliens???

                    Get real and stop with the "best athlete" whining. It is getting old.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      The result would likely be the same as in the LLWS, what have our best athletes lost now, 4 out of the last 5 years???? The problem with soccer is that kids only play in a supervised environment and there is no culture to support the constant play and game watching that occurs in the rest of the world. That is how kids develop creativity and skills, not by doing drills 2-4 times a week.

                      Hell, Switzerland consistently fields a very strong national team (which should have beaten Argentina in the WC) and has many players playing in the best leagues around the world and they have a total population of 8 million!

                      Do people honestly think that they have more gifted athletes playing soccer than the entire USA with 300 million plus a bunch of undocumented aliens???

                      Get real and stop with the "best athlete" whining. It is getting old.
                      In the U.S, soccer is a rich kid game. We do not have any meaningful development presence in the urban areas, or among the poor.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        I think that's perfectly understandable. Having the same weaknesses doesn't translate into the same results when, in one case, you have the elite athletes and, in the other case, you don't.
                        I guess you haven't been keeping up with what happened to the U20 Women's World Cup. And I don't mean in terms of results as much as I mean quality og play.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          The result would likely be the same as in the LLWS, what have our best athletes lost now, 4 out of the last 5 years???? The problem with soccer is that kids only play in a supervised environment and there is no culture to support the constant play and game watching that occurs in the rest of the world. That is how kids develop creativity and skills, not by doing drills 2-4 times a week....Get real and stop with the "best athlete" whining. It is getting old.
                          I spent some time on a beach in Europe this summer and realized US soccer has a long way to go. This is what we are up against: Soccer goal posts on the beach; kids playing soccer-volleyball (regular height net, serving off the sand, no hands); kids juggling the ball, passing it back and forth in the air for minutes at a go; soccer in the street with a tennis ball at 10PM; Soccer ping-pong on these concrete ping-pong tables that are everywhere; Late-teen boys climbing over chain link fence to get onto a basketball court--to play soccer on the pavement!
                          A few hours a week of 'step-overs, scissors, and maradonas' isn't going to turn a nation of young Lebron Jameses into a world power.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            In the U.S, soccer is a rich kid game. We do not have any meaningful development presence in the urban areas, or among the poor.
                            That and a piss-poor development plan that lets anyone start a "club" and pretend to teach soccer. Small countries like Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland - even a bigger one like Germany - have a well thought out plan that is working. When money starts getting involved in youth sports that's where the trouble begins.

                            Sure many of our "best athletes" do other sports but that's not the only driver. Doesn't matter how athletic a kid is if he isn't taught how to play the game right from the get go

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              That and a piss-poor development plan that lets anyone start a "club" and pretend to teach soccer. Small countries like Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland - even a bigger one like Germany - have a well thought out plan that is working. When money starts getting involved in youth sports that's where the trouble begins.

                              Sure many of our "best athletes" do other sports but that's not the only driver. Doesn't matter how athletic a kid is if he isn't taught how to play the game right from the get go
                              We have no farm system comparable to football, basketball, hockey or baseball. We don't have a good system to bring teenage kids into. There are so few academies and no real competition between them. There is no incentive for the clubs to do a good job training after U12-14

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X