The site would remain anonymous but readers will be able to get a feel for where posters are coming from?
If there are 37 negative posts about MK then readers can quickly ascertain that this person has a real axe to grind and probably should be ignored it that is all he ever posts about.
As it stands everyone is just allowed to lob grenades at whichever program they choose and we have no idea if it's legitimate or simply a rival coach trying to inflict damage on a program.
Annonymity is continued but it gives more relevance to the posts and I guarantee would require you to hand out far less IP bans.
You seem to have a fairly good mix from all clubs in Ct so I hardly believe you would lose traffic as the Soccerhead site did. Soccerhead for the most part became a CFC mouthpiece.
Why not use your CT site to experiment?
Thoughts from the readers?
If there are 37 negative posts about MK then readers can quickly ascertain that this person has a real axe to grind and probably should be ignored it that is all he ever posts about.
As it stands everyone is just allowed to lob grenades at whichever program they choose and we have no idea if it's legitimate or simply a rival coach trying to inflict damage on a program.
Annonymity is continued but it gives more relevance to the posts and I guarantee would require you to hand out far less IP bans.
You seem to have a fairly good mix from all clubs in Ct so I hardly believe you would lose traffic as the Soccerhead site did. Soccerhead for the most part became a CFC mouthpiece.
Why not use your CT site to experiment?
Thoughts from the readers?
Comment