Mathman ratings are updated

[Unregistered]

Two top ten U15 teams in Region One - NOT Bad!
But even better -THREE top ten U16 teams in region One

http://www.girlssoccerrate.com/index.cfm

[Unregistered]

So what's the scoop with MM rating younger teams?

[Unregistered]

It's great that the stars and scorps are doing so well, but sad that no other clubs show up until way down the list. Look at Conn. They might not be in the top 10, but they've got 3 in the top 25 at U15.

[Unregistered]

It's great that the stars and scorps are doing so well, but sad that no other clubs show up until way down the list. Look at Conn. They might not be in the top 10, but they've got 3 in the top 25 at U15.

The problem is you have to pursue those rankings. Your team has to go to the tournaments that mathman (or particular ranking organization) covers. It's always been this way with the national rankings. Many teams from MA are good, but they don't participate in the events or enter regional leagues.

Some think it's important and some don't.

[Unregistered]

schubertthrust

The problem is you have to pursue those rankings. Your team has to go to the tournaments that mathman (or particular ranking organization) covers. It's always been this way with the national rankings. Many teams from MA are good, but they don't participate in the events or enter regional leagues.

Some think it's important and some don't.

Who are the teams in MA who are good who do not enter events or regional leagues????

[Unregistered]

Wrong - Mathman ranks all games including league games and state cup games - not just tournament games. If you play and win your league games and state cup games you will get points. However, if you play competition that doesn't have many points, you will not get very many points by beating them. Conversely if you come up against a team with lots of points in the round robin or at a tournament and lose - you won't lose many points either.

[Unregistered]

The problem is you have to pursue those rankings. Your team has to go to the tournaments that mathman (or particular ranking organization) covers. It's always been this way with the national rankings. Many teams from MA are good, but they don't participate in the events or enter regional leagues.

Some think it's important and some don't.

Although many use it that way, MM 's not a "ranking" it's a "rating" and it is based on WHO you play not WHERE you play.

[Unregistered]

It's a combination of league and tournament.

"Make a selection on the right to see how your team rates, by state, region, or nationally. We only give the ratings if your team is a premier team in a league or tournament that we cover (about 300 divisions of 95 leagues, and over 600 tournaments)."

[Unregistered]

Which does not mean you have to play any tournaments.

[Unregistered]

So top 10 U15's in MA

1 FC Stars of Mass United
2 Scorpions Elite
3 MPS Boston Renegades 94 Pr
4 Blackhawks Predators
5 Fuller Hamlets A
6 FC Puma
7 Crusaders United
8 Pioneers
9 Aztecs White Flame
10 FC Greater Boston

top 10 U16's in MA

1 FC Stars of Mass United
2 Scorpions Elite
3 FC Stars of Mass Rovers
4 Fuller Hamlets
5 NE Aztec-Simpson
6 FC Puma
7 MPS Renegades
8 Crusaders [United]
9 Western United
10 Inter SC Boston

[Unregistered]

U15 Fuller Hamlets will drop out of site at the end of this season. This team completely imploded. Watch for the Stars Athletic team to rise up to the ranks. I had thought Explosion FC was an up-and-coming team, until I saw them play in an indoor tournament....

[Unregistered]

U15 Fuller Hamlets will drop out of site at the end of this season. This team completely imploded.

Not true. That team has avoided disaster. It will be a different and good team. They re-organized and have a coach that knows how to win.

[Unregistered]

"They re-organized and have a coach that knows how to win."

And how's that?

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;118852]So top 10 U15's in MA with MM ratings, trends and broken into bands reflecting how far the teams are apart

1 FC Stars of Mass United 1722 (+10)


2 Scorpions Elite 1567



3 MPS Boston Renegades 94 Pr 1274 (-2)
4 Blackhawks Predators 1247
5 Fuller Hamlets A 1247
6 FC Puma 1241
7 Crusaders United 1238

8 Pioneers 1181
9 Aztecs White Flame 1179 (+11)
10 FC Greater Boston 1179


top 10 U16's in MA with MM ratings, trends and broken into bands reflecting how far the teams are apart

1 FC Stars of Mass United 1876 (+24)


2 Scorpions Elite 1666 (-46)

3 FC Stars of Mass Rovers 1566 (+78)



4 Fuller Hamlets 1281 (+25)
5 NE Aztec-Simpson 1274 (-27)
6 FC Puma 1227 (+25)
7 MPS Renegades 1223 (+39)
8 Crusaders [United] 1213 (-1)

9 Western United 1175 (+59)
10 Inter SC Boston 1160 (-24)

So while top tens are nice it really doesn't reflect the ratings differences at the state level.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;118962]

So top 10 U15's in MA with MM ratings, trends and broken into bands reflecting how far the teams are apart

1 FC Stars of Mass United 1722 (+10)


2 Scorpions Elite 1567



3 MPS Boston Renegades 94 Pr 1274 (-2)
4 Blackhawks Predators 1247
5 Fuller Hamlets A 1247
6 FC Puma 1241
7 Crusaders United 1238

8 Pioneers 1181
9 Aztecs White Flame 1179 (+11)
10 FC Greater Boston 1179


top 10 U16's in MA with MM ratings, trends and broken into bands reflecting how far the teams are apart

1 FC Stars of Mass United 1876 (+24)


2 Scorpions Elite 1666 (-46)

3 FC Stars of Mass Rovers 1566 (+78)



4 Fuller Hamlets 1281 (+25)
5 NE Aztec-Simpson 1274 (-27)
6 FC Puma 1227 (+25)
7 MPS Renegades 1223 (+39)
8 Crusaders [United] 1213 (-1)

9 Western United 1175 (+59)
10 Inter SC Boston 1160 (-24)

So while top tens are nice it really doesn't reflect the ratings differences at the state level.

This is nothing new. We all know Stars are vastly superior followed by Scorpions.